Street-Fighting Physics! - SMCC Tech Physics 110 - Professor Kevin Kimball, U.S.N.- retired
You need Flash Player in order to view this.
Geekin' Out!
NEWS:
 
 
26 September 2011 9 (Wired Magazine)
Neutrinos and the Speed of Light — A Primer on the CERN Study
 
 
 
Cross section of the CNGS experiment through the Earth. (Image: CERN)
 
Recently, a group of physicists have been working to measure the neutrinos generated from a particle accelerator at CERN. This group discovered neutrinos arriving faster than would have been expected and they appear to be traveling faster than the speed of light itself, but they draw no definitive conclusions. This has been widely reported as being the end of Relativity, but this is not the case at all.
 
Let’s take a look at what is going on in the experiment and what was reported in the journal article.
 
First, it might help the reader to gain an understanding of the neutrino. Neutrinos are interesting little neutral particles that have almost zero mass. Due to their nature, they can pass through matter without being absorbed.
 
There are three known types of neutrinos: the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino, and the tau neutrino.
 
The experiment in the journal article is referred to as CERN neutrinos to Gran Sasso, or CNGS. The CNGS team is searching for a phenomenon known as neutrino oscillation where muon neutrinos may change into tau neutrinos. A secondary goal of the experiment is to measure neutrino velocity to a great accuracy.
 
In the experiment, neutrinos are generated at theSuper Proton Synchrotron(SPS) particle accelerator at the CERN LHC complex in Geneva and further accelerated down a 1 km beam line toward the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy. At Gran Sasso, a detector instrument called OPERA measures the neutrinos. The distance from CERN to Gran Sasso is 732 km straight through the Earth, traveling up to 11.4 km below the Earth’s surface.
 
Remember, neutrinos don’t interact with matter so the Earth is invisible to the tiny particles.The distance between the two systems is known to within 20 cm.
 
Time is also measured with extreme precision utilizing GPS timing signals and a cesium atomic clock. The GPS used in timing also allows the team to track any small movements in the Earth itself. This even allowed consideration of the effect of the L’Aquila Earthquake that moved the OPERA detector 7 cm.
 
Due to the nature of the experiment, the time is not calculated with a simple, stopwatch style, start to finish measurement. It instead relies on measurements and comparisons of probability distribution functions at the source and the detector. In other words, there is a lot of math involved.
 
In addition to understanding the timing and position variations in the experiment, the physicists also took into account many other variables, such as day versus night and seasonal changes. The sensitivity of this experiment is roughly an order of magnitude better than previous experiments.
 
The speed of neutrinos is measured and compared to the speed of light by subtracting the expected time for light to travel the distance from the time for the neutrinos to travel the same distance. One would normally expect this to be zero for neutrinos traveling at the speed of light or negative for any value below the speed of light.
 
The case presented in the article shows a positive value of 60.7 nanoseconds with statistical and systematic errors providing not nearly enough potential difference to account for the positive value. This value has six-sigma significance. This is, obviously, a stunning finding.
 
The final paragraph is what appears to be overlooked all too often in the reporting on this finding:
 
Despite the large significance of the measurement reported here and the stability of the analysis, the potential great impact of the results motivates the continuation of our studies in order to investigate possible still unknown systematic effects that could explain the observed anomaly. We deliberately do not attempt any theoretical or phenomenological interpretation of the results.
 
This is an important paragraph. This is the group of physicists, together, stating that they don’t know how they came to a result that shows neutrinos apparently exceeding the speed of light.
 
  • They are not drawing any conclusions in this article and are simply providing the finding and the methods used to obtain the finding.
 
  • They are trying to find where there could be errors in their measurements.
 
  • They do not claim that the neutrinos are actually exceeding the speed of light, only that the measurements to date show something unexpected.
 
  • They are reaching out to the high-energy physics community to improve the experiment and data analysis.
 
  • They are not looking to fundamentally change physics but to ensure that they are producing sound data.
 
We may find that nothing comes of this. We may find that there is an effect known in physics that accounts for the difference. We may find that neutrinos are capable of moving slightly faster than the speed of light. It is simply too early to make definitive, wide-reaching conclusions.
 
The conclusion that can be drawn from this article is that a group of experimenters found an unexpected result using some of the most amazing and precise instruments and techniques ever created. No matter what is found to be the actual cause of this 60.7 nanosecond variation, the conclusion you can draw is that it is an amazing time in history where such measurements can be made and an exciting time to be a practitioner or admirer of science.
 
Imagine the findings that will be made by the next couple generations of scientists who are sitting in elementary classrooms right now and just learning that a rainbow is the spectrum of sunlight.
 
Einstein wouldn’t be disappointed by these findings; he would be intrigued and proud to see the legacy of great science continuing forward.
 
Brian is a NASA engineer by day and a GeekDad contributor by night. Opinions shared are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NASA.
 
23 September 2011 Last updated at 13:03 ET
Speed-of-light results
under scrutiny at Cern
 
By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News
Enormous underground detectors are needed to catch neutrinos, that are so elusive
as to be dubbed "ghost particles"
 
A meeting at Cern, the world's largest physics lab, has addressed results that
suggest subatomic particles have gone faster than the speed of light.
The team presented its work so other scientists can determine if the approach
contains any mistakes.
 
If it does not, one of the pillars of modern science will come tumbling down.
Antonio Ereditato added "words of caution" to his Cern presentation because of the
"potentially great impact on physics" of the result.
 
The speed of light is widely held to be the
Universe's ultimate speed limit, and much of
modern physics - as laid out in part by
Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity -
depends on the idea that nothing can exceed it.
 
 “We want to be helped by the community in
understanding our crazy result - because it is crazy”
 
Thousands of experiments have been undertaken
to measure it ever more precisely, and no result
has ever spotted a particle breaking the limit.
 
"We tried to find all possible explanations for this,"
the report's author Antonio Ereditato of the Opera collaboration told BBC News on Thursday evening.
"We wanted to find a mistake - trivial mistakes, more complicated mistakes, or nasty effects - and we
didn't.
"When you don't find anything, then you say
'well, now I'm forced to go out and ask the community to scrutinise this'."
 
Friday's meeting was designed to begin this process, with hopes that other scientists
will find inconsistencies in the measurements and, hopefully, repeat the experiment
elsewhere.
"Despite the large [statistical] significance of this measurement that you have seen
and the stability of the analysis, since it has a potentially great impact on physics,
this motivates the continuation of our studies in order to find still-unknown systematic
effects," Dr Ereditato told the meeting.
 
"We look forward to independent measurement from other experiments."
 
Neutrinos come in a number of types, and have recently been seen to switch
spontaneously from one type to another.
 
 
 
The Cern team prepares a beam of just one type, muon neutrinos, and sends them
through the Earth to an underground laboratory at Gran Sasso in Italy to see how
many show up as a different type, tau neutrinos.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In the course of doing the experiments, the researchers noticed that the particles
showed up 60 billionths of a second earlier than they would have done if they had
travelled at the speed of light.
 
This is a tiny fractional change - just 20 parts in a million - but one that occurs
consistently.
 
The team measured the travel times of neutrino bunches some 16,000 times, and
have reached a level of statistical significance that in scientific circles would count
as a formal discovery.
 
But the group understands that what are known as "systematic errors" could easily
make an erroneous result look like a breaking of the ultimate speed limit.
 
That has motivated them to publish their measurements.
 
"My dream would be that another, independent experiment finds the same thing -
then I would be relieved," Dr Ereditato told BBC News.
 
But for now, he explained, "we are not claiming things, we want just to be helped
by the community in understanding our crazy result - because it is crazy".
 
Related Stories
 
Sep 23, 10:34 AM EDT
Physicists wary of junking light speed limit yet
By FRANK JORDANS
Associated Press GENEVA (AP) --
 
Physicists on the team that measured particles traveling faster than
light said Friday they were as surprised as their skeptics about the
results, which appear to violate the laws of nature as we know them.
 
Hundreds of scientists packed an auditorium at one of the world's
foremost laboratories on the Swiss-French border to hear how a
subatomic particle, the neutrino, was found to have outrun light
and confounded the theories of Albert Einstein.
 
"To our great surprise we found an anomaly," said Antonio Ereditato,
who participated in the experiment and speaks on behalf of the team.
 
An anomaly is a mild way of putting it.
 
Going faster than light is something that is just not supposed to
happen, according to Einstein's 1905 special theory of relativity.
The speed of light - 186,282 miles per second
(299,792 kilometers per second) - has long been considered a
cosmic speed limit.
 
The team - a collaboration between France's National Institute for
Nuclear and Particle Physics Research and Italy's Gran Sasso
National Laboratory - fired a neutrino beam 454 miles (730 kilometers) underground from Geneva to Italy.
 
They found it traveled 60 nanoseconds faster than light. That's
sixty billionth of a second, a time no human brain could register.
 
"You could say it's peanuts, but it's not. It's something that we
can measure rather accurately with a small uncertainty,"
Ereditato told The Associated Press.
If the experiment is independently repeated  ( my emphasis - K.K. )-
most likely by teams in the United States or Japan - then it would
require a fundamental rethink of modern physics.
 
"Everybody knows that the speed limit is c, the speed of light. And if
you find some matter particle such as the neutrino going faster than
light, this is something which immediately shocks everybody,
including us," said Ereditato, a researcher at the University of Bern,
Switzerland.
Physicists not involved in the experiment have been understandably
skeptical.
 
Alvaro De Rujula, a theoretical physicist at CERN, the European
Organization for Nuclear Research outside Geneva from where the
neutron beam was fired, said he blamed the readings on a so-far
undetected human error.
 
If not, and it's a big if, the door would be opened to some wild
possibilities.The average person, said De Rujula, "could, in principle,
travel to the past and kill their mother before they were born.
"But Ereditato and his team are wary of letting such science fiction
story lines keep them up at night.
 
"We will continue our studies and we will wait patiently for the
confirmation," he told the AP. "Everybody is free to do what they want:
to think, to claim, to dream."
 
He added: "I'm not going to tell you my dreams."
 
 
 
 
 
15 September 2011
 
NASA spots first planet in binary star system
By: William Harwood September 15, 2011 4:50 PM PDT
 
    NASA's Kepler space telescope, searching for planets around distant suns, has discovered a Saturn-size world orbiting two stars 200 light years from Earth, a long-sought "circumbinary" planet reminiscent of the fictional world Tatooine in the Star Wars saga."This is the first definitive detection of a circumbinary planet and the best example we have of a Tatooine-type world," said Laurance Doyle, a researcher at the SETI Institute's Carl Sagan Center for the Study of Life in the Universe and lead author of a paper in the journal Science describing the discovery."Now, we don't expect Luke Skywalker or anything else to be living on Kepler-16b, but if you could visit there, you would see a sky with two suns, just like Luke did."
    An artist's concept of Kepler-16b, a Saturn-size world orbiting two stars some 200 light years from Earth.
     
    The discovery by NASA's Kepler space telescope is a first in the ongoing search for planets beyond Earth's solar system.(Credit: NASA) Launched in March 2008, Kepler trails the Earth in its orbit around the sun, aiming a 95-megapixel camera at a patch of sky the size of an out-stretched hand that contains more than 4.5 million detectable stars. Of that total, some 300,000 are the right age, composition and brightness to host Earth-like planets. Over the life of the mission, more than 150,000 of those will be actively monitored by Kepler.The spacecraft's camera does not take pictures like other space telescopes. Instead, it acts as a photometer, continually monitoring the brightness of candidate stars in its wide field of view, on the lookout for the minute dimming that occurs when a planet passes in front of the star.By studying subtle changes in brightness from such planetary transits--comparable to watching a flea creep across a car's headlight at night--and the timing of repeated cycles, computer analysis can identify potential worlds in habitable-zone orbits.The probability of finding sun-like stars with Earth-like planets in orbits similiar to ours--and aligned so that Kepler can "see" them--is about one-half of 1 percent. But given the sample size, that still leaves hundreds of potential discoveries.Last February, the Kepler team announced the discovery of 1,235 potential "exoplanets." At that time, 15 were confirmed and since then, five more confirmations have been announced. Another batch of candidates is expected to be announced next month. But as it now stands, Kepler-16b is the spacecraft's 21st confirmed planet and the first found orbiting a binary star system.Given that binary stars abound, the Kepler discovery likely opens the door for additional findings.
    A family portrait showing the Kepler-16 binary star system and its one known planet.
     
    Given the abundance of binary systems across the Milky Way, the Kepler discovery likely opens the door to additional findings.(Credit: NASA) "This discovery is stunning," Alan Boss, a member of the Kepler team, said in a statement. "Once again, what used to be science fiction has turned into reality."The two stars at the heart of the system are some 200 light years from Earth in the constellation Cygnus.
     
    The larger, yellow star is 69 percent as massive as the sun and the smaller red star is 20 percent as big. Kepler-16b orbits the system's center of mass every 225 days.
     
    "When you have a binary star with planets orbiting that, the binary star produces gravitational perturbations that can be very severe for planets," said Greg Laughlin, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz. "Planets can get tossed out of the system, or tossed into one of the stars."This particular planet is far enough out, it's far enough away from the two binary stars that it effectively is feeling them as a single gravitational attraction. And while there are perturbations, those perturbations aren't severe enough to actually cause problems for the orbit.
     
    "But unlike Tatooine, Kepler-16b, orbiting beyond the system's habitable zone where water can exist as a liquid, is not habitable. Even so, it clearly sparked the imagination of the science team."This is an example of another planetary system, a completely different type that we've never seen before," Doyle said. "That's why everybody's making a big deal of it. Nobody's ever seen a place like this before, with one exception. I seem to remember seeing a place like this about 30 years ago in a galaxy far, far away."
     
    John Knoll, a visual effects supervisor for film maker George Lucas' Industrial Light & Magic for three Star Wars movies, told reporters no one worried at the time that Tatooine did not reflect prevailing scientific theory.
     
    "I don't think George particularly concerned himself that the leading theory of planet formation made this setting somewhat unlikely," he said. "But Kepler-16b is unambiguous and dramatic proof that planets do form around binaries. It's possible there's a real Tatooine out there, a planet like that could really exist."Re-imagining a scene from the first Star Wars movie, Doyle described a sunset on Kepler-16b: "Sometimes, the red star would set first, sometimes the orange star, sometimes they'd set touching each other, sometimes set together. So you'd get this very dynamic sunset. It's never two sunsets are the same."If Skywalker could stand on Kepler-16b, he would see two shadows, Doyle said, adding that "if you wanted to tell the time by sundial, you'd need calculus, you know?"

    Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-19514_3-20106952-239/nasa-spots-first-planet-in-binary-star-system/#ixzz1YcaMZwx1
     
    Monster Storm Detected on Brown Dwarf Star
    Monster Storm Rages on Tiny Misfit Star
    M Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com Senior Writer
    Date: 13 September 2011 Time: 06:00 AM ET
     
    Extreme brightness changes observed on a nearby tiny brown dwarf star may indicate a storm grander than any yet seen on an alien world, scientists say.
     
     
     
    Small, dim star appears to be wracked by a mega storm more violent than any weather yet seen on another world, astronomers announced. CREDIT: Jon Lomberg
     
    The star, called a brown dwarf, is more massive than a giant planet but much lighter than most stars. Over a period of several hours, the star exhibited the largest brightness variations ever seen on a cool brown dwarf.
     
    "We found that our target's brightness changed by a whopping 30 percent in just under eight hours," graduate student Jacqueline Radigan of the University of Toronto said in a statement. "The best explanation is that brighter and darker patches of its atmosphere are coming into our view as the brown dwarf spins on its axis." 
     
     
    25 August 2011
     
    Spiral Galaxy M101
     
     
    Attention all astronomers! There is a new Type Ia supernova that has been seen in the nearby spiral galaxy M101, and it’s very young — currently only about a day old! This is very exciting news; getting as much data on this event as possible is critical.
     
    Most likely professional astronomers are already aware of the supernova, since observations have already been taken by Swift (no X-rays have yet been seen, but it’s early yet) and Hubble observations have been scheduled. Still, I would urge amateur astronomers to take careful observations of the galaxy.
     
    [As an aside, I'll note that this supernova won't get bright enough to see naked eye and poses no threat at all to us here on Earth. It may be visible in decent-sized telescopes, though, and as you'll see this may be a very important event in the annals of astronomy.]
     
    [UPDATE: Joseph Brimacombe took a very nice shot of the new supernova using a 20" telescope in New Mexico. Thanks to Surak who left a comment below about this.]
     
    So why is this a big deal?
     
    First of all, a supernova is an exploding star — one of the most violent events in the Universe. There are different kinds of supernovae, but a Type Ia occurs, it’s thought, when a superdense white dwarf — the remnant core of a dead star — siphons material off a companion star. If enough material piles on top of the white dwarf, it can suddenly start to fuse hydrogen into helium. This starts a runaway effect, and the entire star explodes. This supernova can release so much energy it can actually outshine its host galaxy! If you want more details, I’ve written about Type Ia supernovae before: Astronomers spot ticking supernova time bomb and Dwarf merging makes for an explosive combo.
     
    So this kind of supernova is incredibly bright, making them easy to spot over vast distances. These events are very important, because we think that each Type Ia supernova is very similar in the way it explodes, making them useful as benchmarks in gauging distances to very distant galaxies. In fact, it is the study of these explosions that has helped us nail down how fast the Universe is expanding, and also led to the discovery of dark energy. Clearly, the more we know about them, the better.
     
    M101 is a spiral galaxy only about 25 million light years away, making it one of the closest big spirals in the sky. It’s also huge, boasting a trillions stars, ten times the mass of our Milky Way. You can read all about it in an earlier post featuring the image at the top of this article.
    Given M101′s close distance, this new supernova will be relatively easy to study. And the best part is that the exploding star was caught young: most of the ones we see are far away, and too faint to be seen until they start to reach their maximum brightness after a few days. Getting data on them early is absolutely critical for understanding them, and it’s the hardest part of all this. I am not exaggerating to say this new supernova could be a linchpin in our understanding of these events.
     
    Interestingly, Hubble took images of this galaxy in 2002, and astronomers dug up the archived images and looked at the spot of the supernova to see if anything was there back then. Nothing shows up in the blue filter, but in the red (shown here) there are two stars very close to the position of the future supernova (the circle is centered on the best measurement of the supernova’s position). From their brightness and color, both of these stars are red giants, stars like the Sun but near the ends of their lives. That would fit with the Type Ia supernova: red giants are so big that if there’s a white dwarf nearby, it could suck up their matter and start the chain of events that led to its doom. Further observations may pin this down. If one of these stars is what fed the supernova, that’s seriously cool; there are only a handful of supernova progenitor stars that have ever been seen.
     
    All in all, this is pretty much a big deal. The galaxy is close, pretty, a bit odd, and is hosting the nearest Type Ia supernova seen in decades which was caught when it was less than a day old. I’m excited! I know a lot of telescopes will be aimed at the northern skies over the next few days, and I’ll be very interested to find out what they see.
     
    Image credits: Hubble M101 image: NASA, ESA, K. Kuntz (JHU), F. Bresolin (University of Hawaii), J. Trauger (Jet Propulsion Lab), J. Mould (NOAO), Y.-H. Chu (University of Illinois, Urbana), and STScI; Type Ia art: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss; Hubble image: NASA/ESA/Hubble. Tip o’ the dew shield to paulwarren73.
     
    l.
     
    Related posts:
     
     
     
    LINKS:
    (If you find some interesting and/or funny stuff, copy and paste it in an email:)
     
    ************************************************************************
    A scene from "2001" that I really like because it isn't Hollywood-ized with impossible sound effects:
     
     
    ****************************************************************
     
    Here's some info on Jupiter's moons:
     
    ****************************************************************
     
    NASA link on Jupiter - REAL GOOD!
     
     
     Here's a NASA movie on Jupiter:
     
     
    ****************************************
    Open this link for a synopsis on the history of the atom model:
     
    ****************************************
    A beautiful video production by Alexander Hernandez showing SMCC's Trebuchet in operation:
     
     
    *************************
     
    A "Myth Busters" episode illustrating the effect of the "medium" on soundwaves:
     
    *************************
     
    Here's the video clip of the Apollo astronaut dropping a feather and a hammer on the surface of the moon:
     
     
    **************************
    *************************************************************
     
    Here's the link to watch/review "Judgement Day"
     
     
    **************************
    Whooda thunk dat physics got phunk?
     
     
    **************************
    This is the video that'll really take you down the rabbit hole!
     
     
     
    **************************
    Here's some background on the the finer points of the trebuchet:
     
     
    *************************
    A rather graphic, if not brutal demonstration of projectile motion:
     
     
    *************************
    This has absolutely nothing to do with physics per se,
    but it does go to one of the Great Truths of the Universe:
    DON'T POKE KITTY WITH A STICK !
     
     
    *************************
    More good stuff:
     
    ***************************************************************************
     
    Website provided by  Vistaprint
    Website
    provided by Vistaprint